随着危机的漫延,结果将会怎样?纵观历史,迄今为止,现代国家克服经济危机的手段有三种:1、政府主导的大规模基础设施建设以增加就业,刺激消费;2、新技术革命带动新一轮经济腾飞;3、通过发动对外战争拉动消费与生产,控制资源与交通,并激发民众走出低谷的心理潜能。
Along with the spread of the financial crisis,what kind of result will it turn out to be ? Through out history , modern countries always have three means to overcome the economic crisis.1.Governmental policy of leading the large scale infrastructure construction so as to contribute to employment and consumption.2.A new round of economic blast drove by new technological revolution.3.To stimulate consumption and production ,take over resource and traffic and excite the residents’ emotional potential for resuming the growth by declaring a war.
With the spread of the crisis, the result will be like? Throughout history, so far, to overcome the economic crisis of modern country has the means of three types: one, government-led large-scale infrastructure construction in order to increase employment and stimulate consumption; 2, the new technological revolution led the new round of economic take-off; 3, through the launching of external war driving consumption and production, control of resources and transport, and stimulate the psychological potential of the people out of the bottom.
Means of the three can lead to two results:
First, that is, species means 1,2, the results of this comparison lead to a long and painful, because of the Government in order to save the city, will be substantial in HKNPL, hair bonds, resulting in currency depreciation, the stock fell, inflation, the economy is bound to at around a long time in the bottom will be warmer.
However, as the outbreak of the crisis point and the debtor countries, in order to allow itself to feel better, it may borrow money through a variety of ways, to sell government bonds, coupled with a variety of means to beg, go out to the crisis passed. Made to increase the financial burden of other countries
Second, that the first three kinds of means. That is, the outbreak of local wars, debt reduction. From another perspective, even if the transfer go out, it is likely the outbreak of the war, although the war will consume a large amount of manpower and material resources, but can be a hair war profiteers took advantage of the opportunity. But war can increase domestic demand to promote the production, saving companies the brink of bankruptcy. In addition, the war could raise the national morale, the public's attention on the many challenges from outside, the less on the economic downturn on the inside. The essence of war is the redistribution of resources, are a continuation of politics.
For developing countries, should be the main means of species 1,2, be the first results, although the relatively long and painful process, but to take this opportunity to develop infrastructure, science and technology, in order to lay a solid economic recovery the foundation.
The second, applicable to developed countries, particularly the United States, because of their very advanced technology, economic development, although the reform through new technology to find growth, but the heavy debt. Through the war to improve the economy, achieve warmer is a good approach.
反对几个观点
楼主所言 其一 如果全球达成经济拯救措施的共识 那么完全可以不用大印钞票
只用让盈余国 把盈余买 亏损国的 债券即可,另外你所说的转嫁 不可能实现
想想 以贸易量来看 有哪个高速发展国家 或者发达国家 离得开贸易?在目前国际贸易如此兴盛的今天 你相信各国领导人 都会得 低级的短视症么?
反对 其二 ,发一笔战争财?请问楼主 什么时候参战国是战争中的受益最大方了?不是提升国民士气吧……根深蒂固的民主自由意识,决定了不可能那么号变迁,转移注意力倒是二战的目的。但是结果很惨,似乎只是达到了短时间内的稳定政局的效果。
好像没看清题…… 不好意思 !
百度里不是有吗?